PENGARUH STRATEGI PROCESS-ORIENTED ERRORNEOUS WORKED EXAMPLE DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PERSAMAAN KUADRAT SMP TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN RETENSI, TRANSFER, DAN COGNITIVE LOAD
Endah Retnowati, yogyakarta state university
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan pengaruh strategi process oriented errorneous terhadap kemampuan retensi; (2) perbedaan pengaruh strategi process oriented error terhadap kemampuan transfer; (3) perbedaan pengaruh strategi process oriented error terhadap cognitive load. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif eksperimen. Penelitian ini menggunakan materi persaman kuadrat dan menggunakan uji ancova. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Tidak terdapat perbedaan pengaruh strategi process-oriented errorneous worked example dalam pembelajaran persamaan kuadrat terhadap kemampuan retensi peserta didik, (2) Terdapat perbedaan pengaruh strategi process-oriented errorneous worked example dalam pembelajaran persamaan kuadrat terhadap kemampuan transfer peserta didik, (3) Tidak terdapat perbedaan pengaruh strategi process-oriented errorneous worked example dalam pembelajaran persamaan kuadrat terhadap kemampuan cognitive load peserta didik selama tes kemampuan retensi, (4) Tidak terdapat perbedaan pengaruh strategi process-oriented errorneous worked example dalam pembelajaran persamaan kuadrat terhadap kemampuan cognitive load peserta didik selama tes kemampuan transfer.
Keywords
References
Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merril, M.M. (2003). Transitioning From Studying Examples to Solving Problems: Effects of Self-Explanation Prompts and Fading Worked-Outs Steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.774
Arifin, Z. (2014). Penelitian Pendiidkan: Metode dan Paradigma Baru. PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Artino, A. R. J. (2008). Cognitive Load Theory and the role of learner experience: An Abbreviated Review for Education Practitioners. Association for the Advancement of Computing In Education Journal, 16(4): 425- 439
Bhinnety, M. (2008). Struktur dan Proses Memori. Buletin Psikologi, 16(2), 74-88.
doi:10.22146/bpsi.7375
Brunken, R., Moreno, R., & Plass, J. L. (2010). Cognitive load theory. Camridge University Press.
Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2009). Distinctions between orthographic long-term memory and working memory. Cognitive Neouropsychology, 26(8), 724-751. doi:10.1080/02643291003707332
Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Fransisco, 45(9).
Chen, O., Castro-alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2018). Undesirable difficulty effects in the learning of high-element interactivity materials. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-7. https://doi.org.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01483
Chen Xingliang, Antonija Mitrovic, Senior Member, IEEE, and Moffat Mathews. (2020). Learning From Worked Examples, Erroneous and Problem Solving: Toward Adaptive Selection of Learning Activities. IEEE Transactions On Learning Technologies.
Durkin k., and Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). “The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude,” Learn. Instruction, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 206–214,
Field, Andy. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th Ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (J. Seaman, S. Turpie, N. Sith, & I. Antclift (eds); 5th ed.). SAGE Publication.
Gazali, R., & Atsnan, M. (2018). peningkatan motivasi dan minat belajar matematika siswa
melalui pendekatan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran matematika yang bermakna. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 123-134. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i2.15987 Irwansyah, M., & Retnowati, E., 2019).
Große CS dan Renkl A., (2007) “Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes?,” Learn. Instruction, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 612–634
Huang, Y. H. (2018). Influence of instructional design to manage intrinsic cognitive load on learning effectiveness. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, science and technology Education, 14(6). 2653-2668
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90264
Irwansyah, M. F., & Retnowati, E. (2019). Pengaruh worked example dengan strategi pengelompokan siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan cognitive load. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 62 74, https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6il.21452
Kastolan,dkk. 1992. Identifikasi Jenis-Jenis Kesalahan Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal
Matematika yang Dilakukan Peserta Didik Kelas II Program A1 SMA
Negeri Se-Kotamadya Malang. Malang:IKIP Malang.
Likourezos,V ., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). The variability effect in high and low guidance instruction : A cognitive load perspective. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Mathemathics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2011, 444-451.
Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1) 43-52
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Nurhikmayati, I. (2017). Analisis kesulitan belajar mahasiswa pada matakuliah
matematika dasar. Theorems, 2(1).
Napitulu E. E., (2008). Mengembangkan strategi dan kemampuan siswa memecahkan masalah matematik, Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2) 26-36
Novita, R., Prahmana, R., Fajri, N., & Putra, M. (2018). Penyebab kesulitan belajar geometri
dimensi tiga. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 18-29. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.16836
Nurhikmayati, I. (2017). Analisis kesulitan belajar mahasiswa pada matakuliah
matematika dasar. Theorems, 2(1).
Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approarch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429-434. Https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
Pangesti, F. T. P., & Retnowati, E. (2017). Pengembangan bahan ajar geometri SMP berbasis cognitive load theory berorientasi pada prestasi belajar siswa, Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 33.
https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.vl2il.14055
Rahmadhani, E. (2018). Model pembelajaran process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL): Peningkatan disposisi matematika dan self-confidence mahasiswa tadris matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 159-167. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v0i0.20962
Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 90-108Renkl, 2014; Sweller & Cooper, 1985; Van Gog & Rummel, 2010).
Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2018). Collaborative learning effect when students have complete or incomplete knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(6), 681-692. https//:doi.org/10.1002/acp.3444
Retnowati, E. (2014). Psychology of mathematics learning: Constructing knowledge. Yogyakarta: UNY.
Retnowati, E. (2012). Worked example in mathematics. Paper presented at the 2nd Internationa STEM in Education Conference, Beijing, China. 24 – 27 November
Siegler R. S., Chen, Z. (2008) “Differentiation and integration: Guiding
principles for analyzing cognitive change,” Developmental Sci., vol. 11,
no. 4, pp. 433–448
Sukardi, (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Bumi Aksara.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga S. (2011) Mengubah Interaktivitas Elemen dan Beban Kognitif Intrinsik, Beban Kognitif teori (hlm. 203–218). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag
Sweller, J. (1993). Some cognitive processes and their consequences for the organization and presentation of information. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 1-8
https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539308259112
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problemsolving: Effects on learning, Cognitive science, 12, 257-285.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123-138.
Syahrir, S., Kusnadin, K., & Nurhayati, N. (2013). Analisis kesulitan pemahaman konsep dan prinsip materi pokok dimensi tiga siswa kelas XI SMK Keperawatan Yahya Bima. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 1(1), 89–103.
Van Gog, T., Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct ineducational research. Educational Psychologist, 43(1) ,16-26
https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701756248
van Gog, T., Paas, F., & van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2008) Effects of studying squences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 18(3)
Ward, M., & Sweller, J. (2009). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognitive and Instruction, 7(1), 1-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0701_1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpm.v11i3.22378
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika
e-ISSN: 2987-4386
Website: https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jpm/index
Email: jurnal_pmat@uny.ac.id
Published by: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Office: Jalan Colombo No. 1, Karangmalang, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
View My Stats