RAGAM MODEL SCAFFOLDING DALAM PENGGUNAAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (CHATGPT) PADA PEMBELAJARAN PELUANG DI SMA

Hanifah Mar'atush Shalihah, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
Sugiman Sugiman,

 10.21831/jpm.v12i1.22054

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: 1) mengetahui ragam scaffolding dalam penggunaan artificial intelligence (ChatGPT) pada pembelajaran peluang di SMA; 2) mengetahui persepsi guru dan siswa dalam proses pelaksanaan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan artificial intelligence (ChatGPT) pada pembelajaran peluang di SMA. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah fenomenologi. Setting dalam penelitian ini yaitu salah satu sekolah di Yogyakarta dengan pelaksanaan penelitian pada bulan Mei sampai Agustus 2024. Subjek dalam penelitian ini diambil dengan purposive sampling yakni siswa yang memiliki kemampuan kognitif tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Pada penelitian ini, subjek penelitian ini diambil sebanyak 1 kelas X. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan wawancara, observasi, dan dokumen yang telah diolah sebelumnya.  Analisis data dilakukan dengan Teknik Miles dan Huberman. Berdasarkan penelitian yang telah dilakukan, diperoleh bahwa: 1) ragam scaffolding dalam penggunaan artificial intelligence (ChatGPT) pada pembelajaran peluang di SMA diantaranya adalah possibility engine, socratic opponent, collaboration coach, guide on the side, personal tutor, co-designer, exploratorium, study buddy, motivator, dan dynamic assessor. 2) Pandangan guru terhadap AI umumnya positif, melihatnya sebagai alat yang dapat memperkaya pengalaman belajar, namun juga menyadari tantangan dalam implementasinya. Siswa umumnya melihat AI sebagai alat yang menarik dan membantu dalam pembelajaran mereka, meskipun ada kekhawatiran tentang potensi ketergantungan berlebihan.


Keywords


Scaffolding, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Probability

References


Abdullah, A. H., Mokhtar, M., Halim, N. D. A., Ali, D. F., Tahir, L. M., & Kohar, U. H. A. (2022). A systematic review on the use of ChatGPT and other large language models in education. Education Sciences, 12(10), 680.

Azevedo, R., Taub, M., & Mudrick, N. V. (2018). Understanding and reasoning about real-time cognitive, affective, and metacognitive processes to foster self-regulation with advanced learning technologies. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 254-270). New York: Routledge.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher et al. (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (2nd ed., pp. 59-68). New York: Worth.

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Guskey, T. R. (2010). Lessons of mastery learning. Educational Leadership, 68(2), 52-57.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher–AI complementarity. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 27-52.

Kemendikbudristek. (2021). Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Modul Ajar. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. London: Pearson.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Pane, J., Steiner, E., Baird, M., & Hamilton, L. (2017). Continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. RAND Corporation.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 22.

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational psychology (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 34-54). New York: Routledge.

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261-292.

Indriani, D. E., Sahid, & Retnawati, H. (2023). Implementation of Merdeka Curriculum in Mathematics Learning: Teachers' Perspectives. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2000(1), 012040.

UNESCO. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO.

VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221.

Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Improving students' help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 267-280.

Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-14.

van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.

Williamson, B. (2019). New power networks in educational technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(4), 395-398.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpm.v12i1.22054

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika
e-ISSN: 2987-4386
Website: https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jpm/index
Email: jurnal_pmat@uny.ac.id
Published by: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Office: Jalan Colombo No. 1, Karangmalang, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia

View My Stats