Kemampuan transfer permasalahan bangun datar tidak beraturan dengan goal-free problems

Ivah Nur Ardiana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Endah Retnowati, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

 10.21831/jpm.v8i3.18161

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efektivitas pembelajaran dyads with goal free problems dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran dyads with goal given problems ditinjau dari kemampuan transfer dan cognitive load siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen dengan desain penelitian posttest only control group design. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 64 siswa kelas VII di salah satu SMP di Kabupaten Klaten tahun ajaran 2021/2022. Teknis analisis data yang digunakan yaitu ANCOVA dengan taraf signifikansi 0,05. Instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitiana ini berupa pretest, tes kemampuan transfer, dan rating question untuk mengukur cognitive load. Variabel kovariat dalam penelitian ini berkaitan dengan kemampuan awal siswa pada keliling dan luas segiempat. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa permasalahan bangun datar tidak beraturan yang disajikan menggunakan goal free problems lebih efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan transfer dan cognitive load siswa. Kemampuan awal siswa yang direpresentasikan melalui pretest menjadi salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi keefektivan dari goal free problems. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan adanya hubungan linier antara pretest dengan hasil tes kemampuan transfer dan cognitive load.

 

Kata kunci: goal free problems; dyads; kemampuan transfer; cognitive load

 

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayres, P. (1993). Why goal-free problems can facilitate learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(3), 376–381. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1993.1027.

Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (1990). Locus of difficulty in multistage mathematics problems. The American Journal of Psychology, 103(2), 167–193. doi: 10.2307/1423141.

Bobis, J., Sweller, J., & Cooper, M. (1994). Demands imposed on primary-school students by geometric models. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(1), 108–117. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1010.

Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35. doi: 10.3102/00346543064001001.

Creswell, J. W. (2019). Educational research : Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall

Irwansyah, M. F., & Retnowati, E. (2019). Efektivitas worked example dengan strategi pengelompokan siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan cognitive load. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 62–74. doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v6i1.21452.

Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: The collective working-memory effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 615–624. doi: 10.1002/acp.1730

Maulidya, S. R., Hasanah, R. U., & Retnowati, E. (2017). Can goal-free problems facilitating students’ flexible thinking? AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1), 050001. doi: 10.1063/1.4995128

Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., & Rosyidah, A. N. K. (2019). Problem-solving ability of primary school teachers based on Polya’s method in Mataram City. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 139–149. doi: 10.21831/pg.v14i2.28686

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., et al. (2016). Chapter 2: Perfomance at international bencmark. TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assasement and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Räder, S. B. E. W., Henriksen, A. H., Butrymovich, V., et al. (2014). A study of the effect of dyad practice versus that of individual practice on simulation-based complex skills learning and of students’ perceptions of how and why dyad practice contributes to learning. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1287–1294. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000373.

Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2010). Worked example effects in individual and group work settings. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 349–367. doi: 10.1080/01443411003659960.

Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2018). Collaborative learning effects when students have complete or incomplete knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(6), 681–692. doi: 10.1002/acp.3444

Retnowati, E., Fathoni, Y., & Chen, O. (2018). Mathematics problem solving skill acquisition: Learning by problem posing or by problem solving?. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(1).

Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st Century. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16–21.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically : Problem solving , metacognition , and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. doi: 10.1177/002205741619600202

Sugiman, Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Murdanu. (2019). Learning goal-free problems: Collaboratively or individually?. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 590–600. doi: 10.21831/cp.v38i3.26914

Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123–138. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.

Sweller, J., & Levine, M. (1982). Effects of goal specificity on means-ends analysis and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 463–474. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.8.5.463.

Tolsgaard, M. G., Kulasegaram, K. M., & Ringsted, C. V. (2016). Collaborative learning of clinical skills in health professions education: The why, how, when and for whom. Medical Education, 50(1), 69–78. doi: 10.1111/medu.12814.

Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., Voss, J. F., et al. (1997). Complex mathematical problem solving by individuals and dyads. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 435–484. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1504_1.

Wilkerson-Jerde, M. H., & Wilensky, U. J. (2011). How do mathematicians learn math?: Resources and acts for constructing and understanding mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(1), 21–43. doi: 10.1007/s10649-011-9306-5.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpm.v8i3.18161

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika



Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika
e-ISSN: 2987-4386
Website: https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jpm/index
Email: jurnal_pmat@uny.ac.id
Published by: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Office: Jalan Colombo No. 1, Karangmalang, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia