SIGNALING REDUCE EXTRANEOUS COGNITIVE LOAD FROM SPLIT ATTENTION EFFECTS

Irda Rafiah, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

 10.21831/jpm.v10i3.21761

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pengaruh signifikan antara pembelajaran menggunakan teknik split-attention dengan signaling dan integrated ditinjau dari kemampuan retensi, transfer dan cognitive load. Dalam materi teorema sudut yang digunakan memiliki karakteristik yang menyajikan gambar dan uraian, sehingga diperlukan signaling dalam membantu siswa dalam memahami materi. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen, dengan menggunakan posttest-only control group design yang melibatkan 64 siswa kelas VII pada salah satu SMP di Kabupaten Sleman tahun ajaran 2023/2024 dengan kategori novice leaners. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah ANCOVA dengan taraf signifikansi 0,05 dan menggunakan nilai ulangan sebelumnya (materi sistem pertidaksamaan linier satu variabel) sebagai variabel kovariat. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini  berupa soal tes kemampuan retensi, kemampuan transfer, dan self-rating scale untuk mengetahui cognitive load siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan pengaruh signifikan antara pembelajaran menggunakan teknik split-attention dengan signaling dan integrated ditinjau dari kemampuan retensi, transfer dan cognitive load. Pembelajaran worked example dengan penyajian terpisah yang diberi signaling pada materi teorema sudut sama dengan worked example yang terintegrasi.

Keywords


Cognitive Load Theory, Signaling, Split Attention, Worked Example

References


Albus, P., Vogt, A., & Seufert, T. (2021). Signaling in virtual reality influences learning outcome and Cognitive Load. Computers & Education, 166, 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104154

Alpizar, D., Adesope, ·. O., & Wong, R. M. (2020). A meta analysis of signaling principle in multimedia learning environments. Education Tech Research Dev, 68, 2095–2119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09748-7

Anisa, R., & Retnowati, E. (2024). Pengaruh metode integrated worked example terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan cognitive load. Jurnal Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika, 6(1), 14-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.14421/jppm.2024.61.

Cammeraat, S., Rop, G., & Koning, B. B. (2020). The Influence of Spatial Distance and Signaling on the Split-Attention Effect. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106203

Chen, O., Retnowati, E., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Effects of Worked Examples on Step Performance in Solving Complex Problems. Educational Psychology, 39(2), 188-202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1515891

Chen, O., Retnowati, E., Chan, B. K., & Kalyuga, S. (2023). The effect of worked examples on learning solution steps and knowledge transfer. Educational Psychology, 43(8), 914-928. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2273762

Field, A. (2009). DISCOVERING STATISTICS USING SPSS (3rd Ed). London: SAGE Publication Ltd.

Irfani, N., & Retnowati, E. (2022). Designs of Worked Example to Facilitate Retention and Transfer Capability in Derivatives of Algebraic Functions. Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2577(1), 1-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0096151

Irwansyah, M. F., & Retnowati, E. (2019). Efektivitas worked example dengan strategi pengelompokan siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan cognitive load. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 62-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i1.21452

Jamieson, J. (2004). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with difference scores. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 52, 277–283. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.009

Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An Eye Movement Analysis of the Spatial Contiguity Effect in Multimedia Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(2), 178–19. doi:10.1037/a0026923

Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2014). The Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning. Dalam .. M. Richard E, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (hal. 247–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.013

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Koning, B. B., Rop, G., & Paas, F. (2020). Effects of spatial distance on the effectiveness of mental and physical integration strategies in learning from split-attention examples. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106379

Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 377-389. doi:10.1037//O022-O663.93.2.377

Pangesti, F. T., & Retnowati, E. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Geometri SMP Berbasis Cognitive Load Theory Berorientasi pada Prestasi Belajar Siswa. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 33-46. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14055

Pouw, W. T., Rop, G., Koning, B. d., & Paas, F. (2019). The Cognitive Basis for the Split-Attention Effect. Journal Of Experimental Psychology-general,, 148(11), 2058-2075.

Retnowati, E. (2008). Keterbatasan memori dan implikasinya dalam mendesain metode pembelajaran matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika.

Retnowati, E., & Fadlila, N. (2023). The Compound Area of Quadrilaterals and Triangles : A Worked Example Based Learning Design. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(1), 150-159. doi:https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i1.11678

Roodenrys, K., Agostinho, S., Roodenrys, S., & Chandler, P. (2012). Managing One’s Own Cognitive Load when Evidence of Split Attention is Present. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 878–886. doi:10.1002/acp.2889

Santosa, C. A., Rafianti, I., & Yulistiany, D. (2022). Worked-Example Method on Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability in term of Students’ Initial Ability. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(2), 210-220. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v13i2.33301

Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2018). A meta-analysis of how signaling affects learning with media. Educational Research Revi, 23, 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.11.001

Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 22, 123-138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4

Tindall Ford, S., Agostinho, S., Bokosmaty, S., Paas, F., & Chandler, a. P. (2015). Computer-based learning of geometry from integrated and split attention worked examples: the power of self-management. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 89–99.

Zhang, S., Koninga, B. B., & Paas, F. (2023). Finger pointing to support learning from split-attention examples. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 43(2-3), 207-227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2193696




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpm.v10i3.21761

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika
e-ISSN: 2987-4386
Website: https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jpm/index
Email: jurnal_pmat@uny.ac.id
Published by: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Office: Jalan Colombo No. 1, Karangmalang, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia