Analisis Pola Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Penyelesaian Tugas Akademik Mahasiswa

Siti Latifah Mubasiroh, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia

 10.21831/sakp.v15i2.30155

Abstract


Pesatnya perkembangan Artificial Intelligence (AI) telah mengubah cara mahasiswa menyelesaikan tugas-tugas akademik di perguruan tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pola penggunaan AI di kalangan mahasiswa, meliputi frekuensi pemanfaatan, jenis platform yang mendominasi, serta tujuan utama penggunaannya. Penelitian kuantitatif deskriptif ini menggunakan metode survei terhadap 50 mahasiswa aktif Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam, Fakultas Ilmu Agama Islam, Universitas Islam Indonesia yang dipilih menggunakan teknik non-probability sampling dengan pendekatan purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas mahasiswa 68% menggunakan AI dengan frekuensi beberapa kali seminggu. Selanjutnya 24% mahasiswa menggunakan AI setiap hari, dan 8% jarang menggunakan AI, yakni 1-4 kali dalam sebulan. Jenis AI yang paling dominan digunakan adalah AI Generatif teks. Beberapa di antaranya juga memanfaatkan AI Pemrograman/Desain, juga AI Analisis Data. Tujuan utama mahasiswa menggunakan AI adalah untuk mencari ide atau inspirasi awal tugas, mencati sumber referensi, dan mempercepat penyelesaian tugas. Temuan ini mengindikasikan tingginya adopsi AI dalam aktivitas akademik, sehingga diperlukan regulasi dan panduan literasi AI yang jelas di lingkungan kampus.

Kata kunci: Artificial Intelligence (AI), pola penggunaan, tugas akademik, mahasiswa, AI Generatif


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Azawei, A. (2023). Integrating Generative AI in Higher Education: Expanding TAM to Evaluate Student Acceptance and Engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(8), 4812–4829. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2214123

Baidoo-Annu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62.

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Concerns in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Fauzi, F., Tuhuteru, L., Sampe, F., Ausat, A. M. A., & Heksa, B. (2023). Analyzing the role of Artificial Intelligence in improving the quality of higher education. Journal on Education, 6(1), 4492–4499.

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On the Potential and Limitations of LLMs in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100115

Rahimi, A., & Kurniawan, R. (2024). Adopsi Generative AI di kalangan mahasiswa Indonesia: Efisiensi akademik versus tantangan integritas. Jurnal Edukasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 5(1), 45–58.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in Higher Education: Considerations for Academic Integrity and Student Learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, F. D., & Davis, G. B. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/sakp.v15i2.30155

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Statistik Counter Web Analytics