NATIONAL NUTRITION AGENCY’S RESPONSE TO THE FREE NUTRITIOUS MEAL PROGRAM POISONING (CONTENT ANALYSIS ON BGN.GO.ID)

Dwi Pratiwi, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Andre Novie Rahmanto, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Eka Nada Shofa Alkhajar, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Abstract


This study aims to reveal how the National Nutrition Agency (BGN) communicated its crisis management measures, built a public responsibility image, and maintained institutional accountability amid social pressure following the Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG) poisoning incident. The research employs a quantitative approach using content analysis based on W. Timothy Coombs’ Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT). The data were collected from 35 news reports, articles, and press releases published on the official website bgn.go.id containing BGN’s statements throughout September 2025. The findings show that the most dominant crisis communication strategy used by BGN was justification (34.29%), followed by excuse (22.86%), reminder (17.14%), apology (11.43%), compensation (5.71%), ingratiation (5.71%), and deny (2.86%), while attack the accuser, scapegoat, and victimage were not found. These results illustrate that BGN primarily applied the diminish and rebuild strategies, complemented by bolstering and deny as secondary approaches to strengthen the institution’s image and credibility.


Keywords


National Nutrition Agency; Free Nutritious Meal; SCCT; Crisis Communication;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriaji, M. (2026). Komunikasi Kebijakan dalam Meningkatkan Kepercayaan terhadap Program Makan Bergizi Gratis ( MBG ) Publik. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 5(1), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5291

BBC News Indonesia. (2025). Ribuan kasus keracunan akibat MBG – Evaluasi SPPG dan standar higienis jadi prioritas pemerintah. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cgj119359q4o

Badan Gizi Nasional. (2024). Tentang Badan Gizi Nasional. https://www.bgn.go.id/

Badan Gizi Nasional. (2025). Insight Session With BGN. https://www.bgn.go.id/news/foto/insight-session-with-bgn

Bushmakin, A. G., & Cappelleri, J. C. (2022). Construct Validity and Criterion Validity. In A Practical Approach to Quantitative Validation of Patient‐Reported Outcomes (pp. 151–249). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119376354.ch5

Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049

Coombs, W. T. (2022). Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT): Refining and Clarifying a Cognitive-Based Theory of Crisis Communication. In S. J. Holladay (Ed.), The Handbook of Crisis Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119678953.ch14

Haupt, B. (2022). Crisis communication theories and strategies. In Crisis Communication Planning and Strategies for Nonprofit Leaders (pp. 24–39). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003147480-3

Hegner, S. M., Beldad, A. D., & Kraesgenberg, A. L. (2016). The impact of crisis response strategy, crisis type, and corporate social responsibility on post-crisis consumer trust and purchase intention. Corporate Reputation Review, 19(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-016-0007-y

Holland, D., Seltzer, T., & Kochigina, A. (2021). Practicing transparency in a crisis: Examining the combined effects of crisis type, response, and message transparency on organizational perceptions. Public Relations Review, 47(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102017

Huang, Y. (2024). Government’s crisis response and citizen’s confidence reconstruction: A literature review study from Post COVID-19. Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.61173/2cq5vh11

Hyland-Wood, B., Gardner, J., Leask, J., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2021). Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00701-w

Kiambi, D. M., & Shafer, A. (2016). Corporate Crisis Communication: Examining the Interplay of Reputation and Crisis Response Strategies. Mass Communication and Society, 19(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1066013

Kurnia, N., Indasah, K., & Amarilisya, A. (2022). Tren Kajian Media, Gender dan Inklusi Sosial dalam Senarai Jurnal Komunikasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 20(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v20i2.6784

Link, E. (2021). Information avoidance during health crises: Predictors of avoiding information about the COVID-19 pandemic among german news consumers. Information Processing and Management, 58(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102714

Liu, B. F., Iles, I. A., & Herovic, E. (2020). Leadership under Fire: How Governments Manage Crisis Communication. Communication Studies, 71(1), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2019.1683593

Nuortimo, K., Harkonen, J., & Breznik, K. (2024). Exploring corporate reputation and crisis communication. Journal of Marketing Analytics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00353-8

Park, H. (2017). Exploring effective crisis response strategies. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 190–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.12.001

Pinandhita, G. P., & Saputro, E. P. N. (2024). Strategi komunikasi krisis Humas Kementerian Perdagangan pada kasus kenaikan harga minyak goreng tahun 2022. Lektur: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.21831/lektur.v6i3.20966

Prahl, A., & Goh, W. W. P. (2021). “Rogue machines” and crisis communication: When AI fails, how do companies publicly respond? Public Relations Review, 17(47), 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102077 Get rights and content

Setyowati, N., & Purworini, D. (2023). PT. Garuda Indonesia’s Strategy in Responding to the Increase in Airfare Prices (Quantitative Content Analysis Study on kompas.com and liputan6.com for the August 2nd until September 2nd 2022 Period). Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity), 606–621. https://doi.org/10.23917/iseth.2981

Vafeiadis, M., Bortree, D. S., Buckley, C., Diddi, P., & Xiao, A. (2020). Refuting fake news on social media: nonprofits, crisis response strategies and issue involvement. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 29(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2146

Xue, L., Zhang, Q., & Zhong, K. (2022). Building a Modern Crisis Management System: Organizational Behavioral Analysis (pp. 71–111). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8706-8_4




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/lektur.v9i1.27457

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Pratiwi, Andre Novie Rahmanto, Eka Nada Shofa Alkhajar

 

Creative Commons License

Lektur: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi is published by Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo Yogyakarta No.1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

View My Stats