PENGARUH METODE INTEGRATED WORKED EXAMPLE DALAM MULTIMEDIA PEMBELAJARAN STATISTIKA SMP TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN RETENSI, TRANSFER, DAN COGNITIVE LOAD
Endah Retnowati, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pengaruh antara penggunaan metode integrated worked example dan non-integrated worked example dalam multimedia pembelajaran statistika terhadap (1) kemampuan retensi; (2) kemampuan transfer; (3) cognitive load selama tes kemampuan retensi; dan (4) cognitive load selama tes kemampuan transfer. Penelitian ini merupakan true experiment dengan desain penelitian double-blind, di mana randomisasi dilakukan antara kelompok eksperimen. Dalam proses randomisasi, baik subjek penelitian maupun peneliti tidak mengetahui kondisi perlakuan yang digunakan. Pembelajaran dilakukan melalui tiga fase, yaitu fase introductory, fase acquisition, dan fase tes. Penelitian dilakukan di salah satu SMP Negeri di Yogyakarta, dengan sampel penelitian berjumlah 62 siswa, yang terpilih secara acak. Untuk memperoleh data penelitian, instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes kemampuan retensi dan transfer serta skala pengukuran cognitive load pada akhir butir soal. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah ANCOVA (Analysis of Covariance) dengan nilai tes kemampuan awal dan skor cognitive load selama pembelajaran digunakan sebagai kovariat serta taraf signifikansi 0.05. Hasil analisis menyimpulkan bahwa dalam pembelajaran multimedia statistika, metode integrated worked example tidak lebih unggul secara signifikan dari metode non-integrated worked example ditinjau dari kemampuan retensi, kemampuan transfer, cognitive load selama tes retensi, dan transfer. Oleh karena itu, kedua metode integrated worked example maupun metode non-integrated worked example dapat digunakan sebagai alternatif yang baik untuk mengajarkan siswa kelas VIII cara menghitung nilai rata-rata dari suatu grafik melalui pembelajaran multimedia.
Keywords
References
Aini, R. N. & Retnowati, E. (2023). Apakah metode pembelajaran diferensiasi mengakibatkan cognitive load tinggi?. Jurnal Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14421/jppm.2023.52.88-102
Anderson, W. L. & Krathwohl, D. L. (2001). A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Logman.
Anisa, R., & Retnowati, E. (2024). Pengaruh metode integrated worked example terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan cognitive load. Jurnal Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/jppm.2024.61.14-26
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002181
Bauhoff, V., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2012). Distance matters: Spatial contiguity effects as trade-off between gaze switches and memory load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 790-795.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
Chen, O., Retnowati, E., Chan, B. K. Y., & Kalyuga, S. (2023). The effect of worked examples on learning solution steps and knowledge transfer. Educational Psychology, 43(8), 914–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2273762
Cui, L., Rebello, N. S., & Bennett, A. (2006). Transfer of learning from college calculus to physics courses. Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the National Association for research in Science Teaching.
De Koning, B. B., Rop, G., & Paas, F. (2020). Effects of spatial distance on the effectiveness of mental and physical integration strategies in learning from split-attention examples. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, Article 106379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106379
Hardiess, G., Gillner, S., & Mallot, H. A. (2008). Spatial representation and updating across saccadic eye movements in the human parietal cortex. NeuroImage, 40(2), 956-968.
Jalani, N. H., & Sern, L. C. (2015). The example-problem-based learning model: Applying cognitive load theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 872–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.366
Jiang, Z., Lasry, N., & Levin, D. M. (2018). Expertise reversal effect in reading mathematics texts. Instructional Science, 46(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9421-3
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
Kim, Y. R. (2013). Effects of worked examples on far transfer [University of North Carolina]. In Foreign Affairs. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17615/8td7-ta18
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote Versus Meaningful Learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 31–48). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43-71). Cambridge University Press.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2010). Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
Pouw, W., Rop, G., De Koning, B., & Paas, F. (2019). The cognitive basis for the split attention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 2058–2075. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000578
Reed, S.K. (1999). Word problems (research and curriculum reform). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2010). Worked example effects in individual and group work settings. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443411003659960
Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2018). Collaborative learning effects when students have complete or incomplete knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(6), 681-692.
Richter, T., & Scheiter, K. (2020). Integration of information in text comprehension: The importance of considering prior knowledge when designing multimedia learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 679-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09522-7
Shah, P., & Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013180410169
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185–233. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. Springer Science & Business Media.
Tversky, B. (2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79-111). MIT Press.
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Process-oriented worked examples: Improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding. Instructional Science, 32(1-2), 83-98
Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Medical education, 44(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x
Ye, L., Su, H., Zhao, J. and Hang, Y. (2021), The Impact of Multimedia Effect on Art Learning: Eye Movement Evidence from Traditional Chinese Pattern Learning. Int J Art Des Educ, 40: 342-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpm.v12i2.21834
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika
e-ISSN: 2987-4386
Website: https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jpm/index
Email: jurnal_pmat@uny.ac.id
Published by: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Office: Jalan Colombo No. 1, Karangmalang, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia