REQUEST IN SPIELBERG’S BRIDGE OF SPIES: A PRAGMATIC STUDY
Abstract
This research examines the deployment of the speech acts of request in Spielberg’s Bridge of Spies using pragmatic approach. This study aims at identifying and explaining the types, strategies, and
purposes of request. This research used a qualitative method. The data were utterances spoken by the characters in Bridge of Spies which were analyzed within the dialogue as the context. The data source was the script of the dialogues spoken by the characters. The data sheet was the instrument of this research. To
check the credibility of the analysis, investigator triangulation was applied. The results of this research are described as follows. First, there are four request types found in the movie, i.e. unconventionally indirect
request, conventionally indirect request based on the speaker, conventionally indirect request based on the hearer, and direct request. Second, there are eight request strategies revealed: hint, questioning hearer’s ability/willingness, suggestory formulae, statement of speaker’s wishes/desires, statement of speaker’s
needs/demands, and statement of obligation/necessity, performatives, and imperatives. Third, four request purposes are found in the movie, i.e. request for goods, request for initiation of action, request for
cessation of action, and request for a joint activity.In conclusion, the results demonstrate how the types of request may affect requestees' linguistic behaviour and request purposes may be related significantly to the
choice of request strategies. Thus, the developmental pattern of the request strategies may differ according to the request. As a result, the request types, strategies and purposes are associated to each other.
Keywords: request, types, strategies, purposes, Spielberg’s Bridge of Spies.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Printed Sources
Achiba, M. 2003. Learning to Request in
a Second Language: A Study of Child Interlanguage Pragmatics. London: Cromwell Press Ltd.
Aneshensel, C. S. 2013. Theory-Based Data Analysis for the Social Sciences. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc. Cruse, A. 2006. A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Flick, U. 2004. “Triangulation in Qualitative Research” in U. Flick, E. v. Kardorff and I. Steinke (Eds.). A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Mey, J. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (Second Ed.). London: Blackwell Publishing.
Moleong, L. J. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Searle, John R. and Vanderveken, D. 1985.
Foundation of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, R. M. 2003. Blending Qualitative and Quantitave Research Methods in
Theses and Dissertation. Thousand
Oaks: Corwin Press. Inc.
Trosborg, A. 1995. Interlanguage
Pragmatics.
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
Vanderstoep, S. W. and D. D. Johnson. 2009. Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wallace, D. P. and C. J V. Fleet. 2012.
Knowledge into Action: Research and Evaluation in Library and Information Science. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Khoirunnisa, D. 2015. “A Pragmatic Analysis of Request in English Textbooks for Indonesian Students.” Bachelor’s Thesis. Yogyakarta: English Education Department, Yogyakarta State University.
Dyotra, N.B. 2017. “A Pragmatic Analysis of Requests Expressed by the Main Characters in Nancy Meyer‟s the Intern Movie.” Bachelor’s Thesis. English Literature Department, Yogyakarta State University.
Electronic Sources
Angela – La Screenwriter. 2015. Bridge of Spies Script. Retrieved from http://dreamworksawards.com/down load/B OS_screenplay.pdf on February 4th, 2017.
IMDb. 2015. “Bridge of Spies”. Retrieved from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3682448/ on February 4th, 2017.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.