CRITICISM TOWARDS REPRESSIVE CAPITALIST IDEOLOGIES AND CULTURE IN THE 21ST CENTURY OF THE U.S. IN COLLINS’ THE HUNGER GAMES: A MARXIST ANALYSIS

Niki Septi Pawestri

Abstract


This research aims to analyze (1) how Collins’ The Hunger Games criticizes repressive capitalist ideologies in the 21st century of the U.S., and (2) to identify the prominent capitalist culture in the 21st century of the U.S. that is criticized in Collins’ The Hunger Games. To answer these objectives, this research applied qualitative research method and employed Karl Marx’s theory of ideology discussed by Tyson and Eagleton in their books. The findings of this research show that there are two important points. First, Collins’ The Hunger Games criticizes the repressive capitalist ideologies through the revelation of (1) the degrading natures of rugged individualism and (2) self-reliance as a facade. The degrading natures of rugged individualism are (1) the acceptance to ignorance as a common virtue and (2) the notion of self against other. Meanwhile, self-reliance is revealed to be (1) heavily relied on socioeconomic conditions as its determining elements and (2) prolonging the status quo by prompting ego gratification to its adherents. Hence, those ideologies contain repressive agendas to sustain the relations of dominance and exploitation in the classist society. Second, the prominent culture of capitalism criticized in Collins’ The Hunger Games is commodification, which dehumanizes the main character in the book.

Keywords: ideology, capitalism, Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games, individualism, self-reliance, commodification


Full Text:

PDF

References


Collins, Suzanne. 2008. The Hunger Games. New York: Scholastic Press.

Eagleton, Terry. 1976. Marxism and Literary Criticism. London: Routledge.

_________. 1991. Ideology: an Introduction. London: Verso.

Ferretter, Luke. 2006. Louis Althusser Routledge Critical Thinkers. New York: Taylor & Francis Routledge.

Izaguirre, John. 2014. “The American dream and Literature: How the Themes of Self-reliance and Individualism in American Literature are Relevant in Preserving both the Aesthetics and the Ideals of the American dream”. College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. Retrieved on 6 October 2016. http://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/164

McWilliams, Ellen. 2009. Margaret Atwood and the Female Bildungsroman. Surrey and Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.

Roberts, Adam. 2000. Fredric Jameson Routledge Critical Thinkers. London: Routledge.

Sieber, Sam D. 1974. “Toward a Theory of Role Accumulation”. American Sociological Review. Retrieved on 31 October 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094422

Taylor, Leroy. 1965. “Reviewed Work(s): The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism (Hobbes to Locke) by C. B. Macpherson”. Social and Economic Studies. Retrieved on 9 November 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27853857

Tyson, Lois. 1994. Psychological Politics of the American Dream: the Commodification of Subjectivity in Twentieth-Century American Literature. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

_________. 2006. Critical Theory Today: a User-Friendly Guide. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.