EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM DI SMK NEGERI 2 PENGASIH

Abstract

Abstrak

Penelitian evaluasi ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum 2006 di SMK Negeri 2 Pengasih. Responden adalah 12 guru produktif dan 31 siswa TKJ-TELIN. Penelitian ini menggunakan model evaluasi CIPP. Pengumpulan data menggunakan angket, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa: (1) Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 aspek context responden guru kategori sesuai, responden siswa kategori sesuai; (2) Implementasi Kurikulum 2006 aspek context responden guru kategori sangat sesuai; (3) Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 aspek input responden guru kategori kurang sesuai, responden siswa termasuk dalam kategori sesuai; (4) Implementasi Kurikulum 2006 input responden guru kategori sangat sesuai; (5) Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 aspek process responden guru kategori sesuai, responden siswa kategori sesuai; (6) Implementasi Kurikulum 2006 aspek process responden guru kategori sangat sesuai; (7) Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 aspek product responden guru kategori sesuai, responden siswa kategori sesuai; (8) Implementasi Kurikulum 2006 aspek product responden guru kategori sangat sesuai.

Kata kunci: implementasi, Kurikulum 2013, Kurikulum 2006, CIPP

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate implementation of Curriculum 2013 and Curriculum 2006 in SMK Negeri 2 Pengasih. Respondents are 12 productive teachers and 31 students TKJ-TELIN. This research using CIPPmodel. Collecting data used questionnaires, interviews, documentation. These results indicate that: (1) Curriculum 2013’s implementation in context by teacher are appropriate category, student are appropriate category; (2) Curriculum 2006’s implementationin context by teacher are very appropriate category; (3) Curriculum 2013’s implementationin input by teacher are less suitable category, student areappropriate category; (4) Curriculum 2006’s implementationin input by teacher are very appropriate category; (5) Curriculum 2013’s implementationin process by teacher are appropriate category, student areappropriate category; (6)Curriculum 2006’s implementation in process by teacher are very appropriate category; (7) Curriculum 2013’s implementation in product by teacher are appropriate category, student areappropriate category; (8) Curriculum 2006’s implementation in product by teacher are very appropriate category.

Keywords: implementation, Curriculum 2013, Curriculum 2006, CIPP