THE DISCOURSE OF SATIRE IN POLITICAL CARTOONS

Dela Aditya Paramita

Abstract


Abstract

            Focusing on the use of political cartoon about Donald Trump, this study aimed at analysing the satire in political cartoons. The study first identified the types of satire in political cartoons based on how the cartoon is delivered by the cartoonist. Second, identified the features of satire, both in verbal and visual. Third, revealed the satirical messages in political cartoons. This study employed qualitative method. This study resulted that: the political cartoons significantly employed the direct form of satire; second, among the types of the features of satire, topicality is significantly used in the political cartoons; third, the political cartoons deliver the satirical messages to criticize Trump and his political life for being liar, and irresponsible, and to criticize his new policies.

 

Keywords: discourse, satire, political cartoon

 

Abstrak

            Memfokuskan pada kegunaan kartun politik mengenai Donald Trump, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis satir pada kartun politik. Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi tipe satir berdasarkan bagaimana cara satir disampaikan oleh kartunis. Kemudian, mengidentifikasi fitur-fitur dalam satir, baik secara verbal dan visual. Terakhir, mengungkap pesan satir dalam kartun politik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil penilitian ini adalah: pertama, kartun politik secara signifikan menggunakan tipe penyampaian satir secara langsung; kedua, diantara jenis-jenis fitur satir, aktualitas secara signifikan digunakan oleh kartunis dalam kartun politik; ketiga, kartun politik menyampaikan pesan satir untuk mengkritisi Trump dan kehidupan politiknya karena telah menjadi pembohong dan tidak bertanggung jawab, dan untuk mengkritisi kebijakan-kebijakan barunya.

 

Kata kunci: wacana, satir, kartun politik

Full Text:

PDF

References


Printed Sources

Abrams, M. H., and Geoffrey Galt Harpham. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Boston, Mass: Thomson Wadsworth, 1999.

Ary, D. et al. Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). California: Wadsworth. 2000.

Al-Jauba, E. A Linguistic Study of Characterization in The Selected Novels of Thomas Hardy. University of Pune. 2009

Mazid, Bahaa-eddin M.. CDA and PDA Made Simple: Language, Ideology and Power in Politics and Media. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014.

Bodgan, R. C. and S. K. Biklen. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 1982.

Diamond, Matthew. "No laughing matter: Post-September 11 political cartoons in Arab/Muslim newspapers." Political Communication 19.2 (2002): 251-272.

Dynel, Marta. "Taking cognisance of cognitive linguistic research on humour." Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16.1 (2018): 1-18.

El Refaie, Elisabeth. "Multiliteracies: How readers interpret political cartoons." Visual Communication 8.2 (2009): 181-205.

Fairclough, Norman. Language and Power. London: Longman. 1989.

Fairclough, Norman. Discourse and social change. Vol. 10. Cambridge: Polity press, 1992.

Gilmartin, Patricia, and StanleyD Brunn. "The representation of women in political cartoons of the 1995 World Conference on Women." Women's Studies International Forum. Vol. 21. No. 5. Pergamon, 1998.

Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. Language, context, and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (1985)

Highet, Gilbert. The Anatomy of Satire. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2015.

Holman, C. Hugh, William Harmon, and William Flint Thrall. A Handbook to Literature. New York: Macmillan, 1992.

Jørgensen, Marianne W., and Louise J. Phillips. Discourse Analysis as Theory And Method. Sage, 2002.

LeBoeuf, Megan. "The power of ridicule: An analysis of satire." Senior Honors Projects (2007): 63.

Newman, Matthew L., et al. "Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples." Discourse Processes 45.3 (2008): 211-236.

Meyer, John C. "Humor as a double‐edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication." Communication theory 10.3 (2000): 310-331.

McGregor, Sue LT. "Critical discourse analysis-A primer." Kappa Omicron Nu FORUM. Vol. 15. No. 1. 2003.

Perrine, Laurence. Sound and Sense: An Introduction to Poetry. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977.

Phelan, Sean, and Lincoln Dahlberg. "Discourse theory and critical media politics: An introduction." Discourse theory and critical media politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2011. 1-40.

Simpson, Paul. On The Discourse of Satire: Towards a Stylistic Model of Satirical Humour. Vol. 2. John Benjamins Publishing, 2003.

Templin, Charlotte. "Hillary Clinton as threat to gender norms: Cartoon images of the first lady." Journal of Communication Inquiry 23.1 (1999): 20-36.

Vanderstop, S.W. and D. D. Johnston. Research methods for everyday life. San Francisco: Jossey.Bass. 2009.

Wahyuni, S. (2012). Qualitative research method: Theory and practice. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Woods, Nicola. Describing Discourse: A Practical Guide to Discourse Analysis. Routledge, 2014.

Electronic Source

National Museum of Australia. Behind the Lines. The Year’s Best Cartoons, National Museum of Australia from www.nma.gov.au/exhibitions/past_exhibitions/behind_the_ lines_2006_the_years_best_cartoons/ on 31st March 2018

El Rafaie, Elisabeth. Multiliteracies: how the readers interpret political cartoon from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470357209102113 on 10th April 2018.

Iro Sani,. Linguistic analysis on the construction of satire in Nigerian political cartoons: The example of newspaper cartoons from http://www.academicjournals.org/jmcs/abstracts/abstracts/abstracts2012/Mar/Sani et al.htm on 10th April 2018


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.