Deforestation, Media, And Governance: A Discourse Network Approach to Indonesian Online News

Citra Safira, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Yofiendi Indah Indainanto, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Faizal Hamzah Lubis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Abstract


The study maps the discourse architecture of deforestation in Indonesian online media and assesses how actors, concepts, and issue frames are interconnected. Using a sample of 40 articles from eight portals (2024–2025), discourse-network analysis is employed to map the co-occurrence of actors and concepts. It interprets their position by connectivity and network density. The findings indicate two predominant competing blocks—environment versus economy-development—though they ultimately converge at the governance node (e.g., forest management policy, production forests, and palm oil plantation security). The Forest Management Policy operates as the axis, while Food and Energy serves as the corridor where consistent productivity claims are woven with ecological claims (coupled framing). At the level of actors, the government promotes the discourse, NGOs highlight ecological concerns, and academics act as brokers, providing evidential references to connect both blocs. These results validate the logic of agenda-setting: actors who are most prominently mentioned and cross-cut issues wield more influence in shaping the trajectory of public discourse. Policy implications are discussed, including enhancing data openness, providing space for diverse voices in the media, and defining better roles for knowledge users as connectors between arguments about production efficiency, food/energy security, and ecological boundaries.

Keywords


Deforestation, Discourse Network Analysis; Environmental Framing of Development, Forest Governance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barranco, O., Lozares, C., & Muntanyola-Saura, D. (2022). A Network Discourse Analysis with Mixed Methods for the interpretation of qualitative interviews. Papers, 107(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.3081

Bossner, F., & Nagel, M. (2020). Discourse networks and dual screening: Analyzing soles, content and motivations in political twitter conversations. Politics and Governance, 8(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2573

Cronin, T., Santoso, L., Di Gregorio, M., Brockhaus, M., Mardiah, S., & Muharrom, E. (2016). Moving consensus and managing expectations: media and REDD+ in Indonesia. Climatic Change, 137(1–2), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1563-3

Eichel, A., Lapesa, G., & im Walde, S. S. (2022). Investigating Independence vs. Control: Agenda-Setting in Russian News Coverage on Social Media. 2022 Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC 2022, 5314–5323. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85144397129&partnerID=40&md5=55715c56a72aad6adf16045d05a7c61d

FWI. (2024). Persoalan Deforestasi di Indonesia: Sebuah Polemik Berkelanjutan. https://fwi.or.id/persoalan-deforestasi-di-indonesia-sebuah-polemik/#:~:text=Deforestasi Netto adalah perubahan secara,tertentu (FWI%2C 2020)

Gebara, M. F., May, P. H., Carmenta, R., Calixto, B., Brockhaus, M., & Di Gregorio, M. (2017). Framing REDD+ in the Brazilian national media: how discourses evolved amid global negotiation uncertainties. Climatic Change, 141(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1896-1

Global Forest Watch. (2024). Indonesia. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/IDN/?lang=id

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2023). Laju Deforestasi Indonesia Tahun 2021-2022 Turun 8,4%. https://www.menlhk.go.id/news/laju-deforestasi-indonesia-tahun-2021-2022-turun-8-4/

Kim, J. (2024). Distributive Justice in Collaborative Outputs: Empowering Minority Viewpoints Through Deliberation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad012

Lumbanrau, R. E. (2025). Kisah perempuan Papua di balik peristiwa viral Save Raja Ampat – “Biarpun ditangkap, saya tetap berjuang.” https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c4g3l2x23plo

Mangani, A. (2021). When does print media address deforestation? A quantitative analysis of major newspapers from US, UK, and Australia. Forest Policy and Economics, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102537

Manurung, T., Sukmara, D., & Younastya, A. (2025). Status Deforestasi Indonesia 2024. https://simontini.id/id/status-deforestasi-indonesia-2024

Moeliono, M., Gallemore, C., Santoso, L., Brockhaus, M., & Di Gregorio, M. (2014). Information networks and power: Confronting the “wicked problem” of REDD+ in Indonesia. Ecology and Society, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06300-190209

Park, M. S. (2013). The dual role of the media in environmental communication as a public sphere and as political actors. Forest Science and Technology, 9(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2012.759162

Prawira, I., Evelina, L. W., Irawan, R. E., & Rizkiansyah, M. (2023). Media agenda building to contribute to forest fire handling and prevention in Indonesia and Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2594. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0110204

Prawira, I., Irawan, R. E., Evelina, L. W., & Rizkiansyah, M. (2021). The media agenda-setting on Indonesian forest fires: Content analysis study on three Indonesia online news media. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 729(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/729/1/012082

Schaub, S., & Metz, F. (2020). Comparing discourse and policy network approaches: Evidence from water policy on micropollutants. Politics and Governance, 8(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2597

Suhandano, S., Firmonasari, A., & Isti’anah, A. (2024). Infrastructure discourse in Indonesian media: An ecolinguistic perspective. World of Media, 2024(3), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.30547/worldofmedia.3.2024.3

Sung, B., Chen, H., & Park, S. D. (2024). Who Drives Policy Discourse of China’s Energy Transition: Considering Time Series Perspective, Network and Core-Peripheral Analysis. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241240862

Wessa, P., Poelmans, S., & Holliday, I. E. (2013). Analysis of constructivist, network-based discourses: Concepts, prospects, and illustrations. In Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis (pp. 19–41). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4426-7.ch002




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/lektur.v8i4.25553

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 CITRA SAFIRA

 

Creative Commons License

Lektur: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi is published by Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo Yogyakarta No.1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

View My Stats